My only thought on this is that Gesture isn't complete yet. Last I knew scaffolding wasn't even implemented. Not to say that everyone uses that or anything. But it's still in theory at least, a moving target.
Doug Hughes, President Alagad Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 888 Alagad4 (x300) Office: 919-550-0755 Fax: 888-248-7836 On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:24 PM, aRs3N1c42 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I took the plunge to start working with frameworks in the last year. > I started by following Dan Wilson's Model-Glue tutorial on his blog > and found it to be an exceptional learning tool. I then went on to > attend the Mach-ii workshop at this year's cf.objective() which served > to reinforce the cfc and oo learning I had done with Model-Glue. > > I would agree with Jared that there's no real reason to learn Unity > now that Gesture is available. And I also agree that diversity is > good in frameworks. Having explored MG:U and M2 as well as sat in on > sessions on Coldbox at cf.objective() there are things about each of > these frameworks that I can get excited about and things that I would > prefer to see different. Place no artificial limitations on yourself > and explore and learn as much about each of the available frameworks > as you can. > > - Jeff > > On Sep 5, 11:35 am, polobruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am working on building a small application and wanted to try to > > learn a framework in the process. Do you suggest sticking with MG v2 > > or should i start out with v3 alpha? > > > > Also any thoughts on MG over Coldbox for a beginner? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
