Denny, I've got a patch for this in the works... it's gone to Dan but it broke his test app, so I have to revise it. This should get committed in the next day or so.
J On Oct 9, 2008, at 12:56 AM, denstar wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:32 PM, denstar wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Jared Rypka-Hauer wrote: >>> >>> Are you getting an error? Perhaps sending in the error regarding >>> makeEventBean() would be better in this case than sending in a >>> patch. >>> Your patch isn't going to work because the CollectionBeanMaker is >>> set >>> up to handle typed structs for passing to remoting endpoints. In >>> order for that to work, CollectionBeanMaker doesn't need a setter to >>> inject a value from the collection into the target and your patch >>> would break it. > > Oh yeah, I think I started getting this when I ported an MG2 app to > MG3, and it stemmed from a generic commit. > > Could be something I did tho... or are generic commits functional? > > :Den --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
