As I said to Dan earlier today - if you want to run with Codex, and need a hand getting it up and running, more than happy to help out. Just let me know. Mark
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Doug Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > At this point I believe the intent is to get this done a quickly as > possible. I figure we'll come back to the wiki engine later. :) > > Doug Hughes, President > Alagad Inc. > [email protected] > 888 Alagad4 (x300) > Office: 919-550-0755 > Fax: 888-248-7836 > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Mark Mandel <[email protected]>wrote: > >> If you want to look at other options, you could always grab a copy of >> Confluence for OSS? >> >> Mark >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Doug Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Do we really want to be the group who implies everything else is crap? I >>> vote for inclusiveness. We wouldn't be bashing MG by using an existing >>> product that uses something else (think Trac, for example). >>> >>> With that said, I think we should simply have one long HTML file we keep >>> in SVN and any committer can edit. After release we can fork that out into >>> a wiki or something. >>> >>> Doug Hughes, President >>> Alagad Inc. >>> [email protected] >>> 888 Alagad4 (x300) >>> Office: 919-550-0755 >>> Fax: 888-248-7836 >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Dennis Clark <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I like the idea of an MG-based solution for MG docs, not because I think >>>> its wrong to not use MG but because using MG would be a form of >>>> dogfooding <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_one%27s_own_dog_food>. >>>> However at this point I believe dogfooding must take a lower priority to >>>> getting MG3 released in a timely manner. >>>> >>>> I have not played with ColdBox yet but I do like what I've seen so far, >>>> and I intend to learn ColdBox even while advocating Model-Glue to my >>>> coworkers. I see no contradiction in this: ColdBox and Model-Glue are >>>> different. I see Model-Glue being a better fit in my current work >>>> environment than ColdBox, but I also see ColdBox as being a potentially >>>> better fit for (as-yet-unknown) projects I might work on in the future. >>>> >>>> My inclination at this point is to support CodexWiki over CanvasWiki >>>> (and either over RoboHelp). Building a good Wiki in MG3 (either as an >>>> update >>>> to CanvasWiki or as a new app built from the ground up) can wait until >>>> after >>>> MG3 is released. >>>> >>>> My two cents, >>>> >>>> Dennis >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Dan Wilson <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah, of course, Brian. I know you are a pragmatic guy. I've been >>>>> having conversations with a number of people in the last weeks about MG >>>>> docs. Both authors using RoboHelp and developers using RoboHelp to get >>>>> helped, the sentiments are roughly the same. People would rather not go >>>>> the >>>>> RoboHelp way. >>>>> Here's the article I mentioned I was writing yesterday: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.model-glue.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/3/25/On-ModelGlue-and-CodexWiki >>>>> >>>>> I know pretty much everyone on this list agrees with me. I just wanted >>>>> to bring the position to light. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> DW >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> E: [email protected] >> W: www.compoundtheory.com >> >> >> >> > > > > -- E: [email protected] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
