Do we really want to be the group who implies everything else is crap? I vote for inclusiveness. We wouldn't be bashing MG by using an existing product that uses something else (think Trac, for example).
With that said, I think we should simply have one long HTML file we keep in SVN and any committer can edit. After release we can fork that out into a wiki or something. Doug Hughes, President Alagad Inc. [email protected] 888 Alagad4 (x300) Office: 919-550-0755 Fax: 888-248-7836 On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Dennis Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the idea of an MG-based solution for MG docs, not because I think > its wrong to not use MG but because using MG would be a form of > dogfooding<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_one%27s_own_dog_food>. > However at this point I believe dogfooding must take a lower priority to > getting MG3 released in a timely manner. > > I have not played with ColdBox yet but I do like what I've seen so far, and > I intend to learn ColdBox even while advocating Model-Glue to my coworkers. > I see no contradiction in this: ColdBox and Model-Glue are different. I see > Model-Glue being a better fit in my current work environment than ColdBox, > but I also see ColdBox as being a potentially better fit for > (as-yet-unknown) projects I might work on in the future. > > My inclination at this point is to support CodexWiki over CanvasWiki (and > either over RoboHelp). Building a good Wiki in MG3 (either as an update to > CanvasWiki or as a new app built from the ground up) can wait until after > MG3 is released. > > My two cents, > > Dennis > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Dan Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, of course, Brian. I know you are a pragmatic guy. I've been having >> conversations with a number of people in the last weeks about MG docs. Both >> authors using RoboHelp and developers using RoboHelp to get helped, the >> sentiments are roughly the same. People would rather not go the RoboHelp >> way. >> Here's the article I mentioned I was writing yesterday: >> >> >> http://www.model-glue.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/3/25/On-ModelGlue-and-CodexWiki >> >> I know pretty much everyone on this list agrees with me. I just wanted to >> bring the position to light. >> >> >> DW >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
