If you want to look at other options, you could always grab a copy of Confluence for OSS?
Mark On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Doug Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > Do we really want to be the group who implies everything else is crap? I > vote for inclusiveness. We wouldn't be bashing MG by using an existing > product that uses something else (think Trac, for example). > > With that said, I think we should simply have one long HTML file we keep in > SVN and any committer can edit. After release we can fork that out into a > wiki or something. > > Doug Hughes, President > Alagad Inc. > [email protected] > 888 Alagad4 (x300) > Office: 919-550-0755 > Fax: 888-248-7836 > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Dennis Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I like the idea of an MG-based solution for MG docs, not because I think >> its wrong to not use MG but because using MG would be a form of >> dogfooding <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_one%27s_own_dog_food>. >> However at this point I believe dogfooding must take a lower priority to >> getting MG3 released in a timely manner. >> >> I have not played with ColdBox yet but I do like what I've seen so far, >> and I intend to learn ColdBox even while advocating Model-Glue to my >> coworkers. I see no contradiction in this: ColdBox and Model-Glue are >> different. I see Model-Glue being a better fit in my current work >> environment than ColdBox, but I also see ColdBox as being a potentially >> better fit for (as-yet-unknown) projects I might work on in the future. >> >> My inclination at this point is to support CodexWiki over CanvasWiki (and >> either over RoboHelp). Building a good Wiki in MG3 (either as an update to >> CanvasWiki or as a new app built from the ground up) can wait until after >> MG3 is released. >> >> My two cents, >> >> Dennis >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Dan Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, of course, Brian. I know you are a pragmatic guy. I've been having >>> conversations with a number of people in the last weeks about MG docs. Both >>> authors using RoboHelp and developers using RoboHelp to get helped, the >>> sentiments are roughly the same. People would rather not go the RoboHelp >>> way. >>> Here's the article I mentioned I was writing yesterday: >>> >>> >>> http://www.model-glue.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/3/25/On-ModelGlue-and-CodexWiki >>> >>> I know pretty much everyone on this list agrees with me. I just wanted to >>> bring the position to light. >>> >>> >>> DW >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- E: [email protected] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
