On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Robin Berjon wrote: > Wing has been widely tested in the field iirc, it's > probably a good idea to base anything in that domain on > it. possibly. groupware applications aren't that complex really, tho (except for calendaring and scheduling); the main problem is that they're *large* when they become featureful, and in some ways it feels like a waste to build a new one just cos "i want to do it my way". i'd really like to see an app with a much more outlook-ish interface than twig. and i don't think wing has all of the pim functionality that twig has. can't say if wing is a good starting point for that or not.
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? martin langhoff
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module... martin langhoff
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache mo... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache mo... clayton cottingham
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? Perrin Harkins
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache mo... Ričardas Čepas
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apac... Michael
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache mo... Robin Berjon
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apac... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) ... Robin Berjon
- backtick behavior Doug Brewer
- Re: backtick behavior Joshua Chamas
- Re: backtick behavior Reini Urban
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module... martin langhoff
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache mo... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? George Sanderson
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? John Saylor