[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Yes, you sure do. Please explain why '62 is some magical cut-off point
> Paul.
> Other than the Feld (Bolan) article appearing. It is probably safe to
> say that
> he was dressing that way in '61 or '60 even....shall we back date even
> further?
> What happened in '62 Paul? Was there a particularly vicious commercial
> Shirelles record released? And as someone else pointed out, you seem to
>
> dress more '66 than '61....you were very proud of your simulated
> Marriott centerpart backcomb
> as I recall. By your standards, this would be the epitome of
> commercialized sell-out period mod.
You're just being stupid! You don't have to agree with me - but if you
really don't even *understand* what I'm talking about then I can't be
bothered with you!
Even Julian added a comment along the lines of 'isn't that everyone's
view anyway'.... (obviously not Julian..)
- Paul
____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
