In article <> you wrote:
> Yes. The beta version are suposed to work on NT. I found the problem was
> in the pathing program. I found another port of GNU patch (2.1) and it
> worked. Now I have it build on NT 4.0 (apache 1.3.3 and mod_ssl 2.1b6)
> with a few warning messages. I don't know how serious these warning are.
> But I'll find out soon.
FYI: I used patch 2.5 from CygWin32's B19 package. Trung used a native
compiled patch 2.5.
Which warnings do you mean? Warnings while compiling the ssl_xxx_yyy.c source
files are other Apache sources? For the SSL sources there should be _no_
warning (at least with MSVC 5.0 there is no for me) while other parts inside
Apache cause warnings.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
