14-Nov-98 15:01 you wrote:

> The last days I spent a lot of time to create the new User Manual for the
> forthcoming 2.1.0 release. The current state is that all chapters except for
> Chapter 4 (Compatibility) are now finished (at least IMHO ;-). So you now can
> have a preview under

>   http://www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/docs/2.1/

> The idea behind this new user manual is:

> 1. Although it's a HTML/online document, it's prepared
>    to form a nice paper/offline document when printed
>    via Postscript from Netscape 4.x.

May be better to put .ps and .pdf files for download as well ?

> 2. It's a lot more comprehensive than the mod_ssl 2.0 documentation.
>    Especially because it now contains a large SSL introduction chapter to
>    smooth the nasty stone-path new users have to walk when they want to use
>    SSL with Apache.

> 3. It provides a lot more details on SSLxxxx directives. For instance
>    the first time the SSLCipherSuite (in the past SSLRequiredCiphers)
>    is documented, etc.

> Please give me your opinion.

Looks good except one problem: only 1/3 of my screen is used! Text looks like
narrow column in the middle of screen and 2/3 of screen is just wasted :-((
BTW other pages on http://www.engelschall.com are also less then 1/2 of screen
(usually on left) and this nasty blue bar on right :-(( Gosh.

P.S. Yes, I know: I'm stupid geek who use full-screen browser in 1800x1440 for
web-surfing but still there are A LOT OF web sites with more or less
appropriate look (http://www.linuxhq.com, http://lwn.net/, http://www.apache.org,
http://www.linuxworld.com, http://www.apacheweek.com, http://stashdot.org,
http://www.linux.org.uk/, http://www.netcraft.com/ to name a few) but not
http://www.cnet.com or http://www.engelschall.com :-((


______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to