I noticed that the Intel shows 1000 TPS. That sounds good. You also note
that it decrypts the traffic to just HTTP, does this mean the HTTP servers
don't need mod_ssl, etc?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Gonyou
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 8:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone have any comments on SSL Accelerators?
>
>
> At this point ALL the accelerators I've tested are indeed
> FAST. One thing
> which has popped up during this testing however, and
> something I've yet
> to do, is see if the 7110 will handle multiple vips and ssl
> certs on it.
> My suggestion for any of you wishing to try SSL accelerators
> is to pick 3
> companies, and get eval units. One thing I can say about
> nCipher, is they
> are the fastest so far, but that I don't know about multiple
> certs there
> as well. Also, given the fact that the new Intel chips coming
> at the end
> of the year, beginning of next, will have FPU for SSL
> Accleration built
> in. So in that light, it may not even be necessary to actually buy a
> device specifically for SSL acceleration. Here's a
> spreadsheet I made in
> gnumeric which shows my findings as to how several popular SSL
> accelerator device manufacturers compare against each other.
> Austin
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> On 9/20/00, 4:31:45 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> regarding Re: Anyone
> have any comments on SSL Accelerators?:
>
>
> > I'd be interested in hearing your comments and anyone elses for that
> > matter. I'm currently evaluating nCipher and Rainbows Cryptoswift
>
> > steve
>
>
> > >>>>> "Austin" == Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Austin> Dan, This is a specific project I'm currently working
> > Austin> on. Talk to me and I'll try and answer what I can. I'm
> > Austin> currently evaluating, F5 Big IP, Ncipher, and the Intel
> > Austin> 7110. Austin
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> > Austin> On 9/20/00, 12:31:38 PM, Dan Browning
> > Austin> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Anyone have
> > Austin> any comments on SSL Accelerators?:
>
>
> > >> I'm thinking about getting an SSL Accelerator. Intel has one
> > >> that intercepts packets in-between your web server(s) and net
> > >> connection. Then it does the encryption/decryption required
> > >> and passes the traffic along to the web server(s).
> It's called
> > >> the NetStructure(TM) 7110 e-Commerce Accelerator and the
> > >> NetStructure(TM) 7180 e-Commerce Director. I've included an
> > >> HTML for ref. Has anyone had any experience with these or
> > >> other accelerators? Intel says that 90% of cpu util
> can be SSL
> > >> (sounds fishy to me).
>
> > >> I would just be interested in any comments you might have.
> > >> Thanks,
>
> > >> Dan Browning Network & Database Administrator
> Cyclone Computer
> > >> Systems
> > Austin>
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> > Austin> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)
www.modssl.org User
> Austin> Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated
> Austin> List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
