* Marcus Thiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-07 16:38]: > It is currently named MPlayer.pm (which is quite idiomatic "use > MPlayer;") but I'm not sure if this is OK for CPAN (top level namespace) > and follow up modules (if someone bothers to write real c bindings for > perl, maybe MPlayer::Slave would be better).
Based on a CPAN search for modules with "play" in their name, I'd suggest calling your module Media::MPlayer. However, since that TLNS doesn't exist, maybe it could be shoehorned into Video::MPlayer, even though that's not what you're using the module for. (It could be argued that video playback is MPlayer's most important function.. but I dunno. *shrug*) If you want to use Media::, bouncing a mail off of the module cabal might be a good idea - you're establishing a new TLNS after all. ::Slave is a good idea IMHO, for the reason you stated, making it Video::MPlayer::Slave. Or maybe ::Master, because the module is the master and MPlayer is the slave. Or maybe ::Remote.. or something. Pick one to your liking. :) -- Regards, Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
