On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 19:14, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > Based on a CPAN search for modules with "play" in their name, I'd > suggest calling your module Media::MPlayer. However, since that > TLNS doesn't exist, maybe it could be shoehorned into > Video::MPlayer, even though that's not what you're using the > module for. (It could be argued that video playback is MPlayer's > most important function.. but I dunno. *shrug*)
The way I think about it is what you're actually searching for. If
you're searching for an interface for MPlayer, you would search for
MPlayer, so this doesn't seem to be a problem after all. But
Video::MPlayer sounds to much like an interface for video playback and
that is not really the spirit of the module (TM).
> If you want to use Media::, bouncing a mail off of the module
> cabal might be a good idea - you're establishing a new TLNS after
> all.
Media sounds good for me, but there I got the problem with the TLNS
again and IMHO there are to many of them.
> ::Slave is a good idea IMHO, for the reason you stated, making it
> Video::MPlayer::Slave. Or maybe ::Master, because the module is
> the master and MPlayer is the slave. Or maybe ::Remote.. or
> something. Pick one to your liking. :)
Video::MPlayer::Slave works for me....
with pain.
Thanks and have fun,
Marcus
--
---------------------------------------------------------
|Marcus Thiesen ICQ# 108989768|
---------------------------------------------------------
| www.thiesenweb.de |
---------------------------------------------------------
28A7 37CC AE2C BB6C D56D 8A3D E614 E56B 7546 75F2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
