Re: DFA::StateMachine

[David E . Wheeler]

On Dec 16, 2004, at 4:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In version 2 I'll make the states objects. But this
will do for now. :-)
I mean making the whole "DFA" an object.
Once you can return a whole DFA, you could easily
explore states and do backtracking in a higher level
of abstraction.
Yes, I had the same thought. And while I may well add that aat some 
point, as I said, this gets me what I need for now. Ovid did add a 
stack() method, at least, so you can get a list of all the states your 
machine has been in. That's in 0.05.

Cheers,
David