On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:01:50 +0200 "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code looks OK. The tests aren’t very good, but they’re better > than some of my test suites, so that’s OK, too. OK. Well, I'd appreciate hearing any suggestions on more things to test... I'm a big fan of getting the testing right, but often I can't quite think of things to test. Usually I end up expanding test code on account of bug reports. Though obviously it's better to know of issues before they're reported as bugs. :) > The POD is jarring, though. Use uppercase section names, and > stick to their common names. Curb your abuse of italics and > lists-for-indentation. Use commata in the signature shown and > lose the redundant `sub` bit. Describe your inputs/outputs in > prose, this isn’t Javadoc. OK; have done all that. I think the docs look a bit better now - more like other perl modules. > Also, there are neither README nor Changes files to help your > human readers nor a META.yml to make work easier for the > machines. Have added Changes and META.yml now. I suspect it'll take me a few iterations before I get this one right... Any more comments from anyone on new version 0.02? -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
