David Golden wrote: > I was tipped off by a bug report about M::B on a Perl with -Uusedl: > https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=46178 > > Now that M::B is in core, this is a problem for core testing as well. > > EU::MM has some explicit instructions for linking extensions to a > static perl, but I don't see anything in M::B that is comparable. > Does it just not support static Perls at all? > > The broader question is whether the offending tests should skip if > $Config{usedl} is false -- which is really just sort of papering over > the flaw -- or if someone who understands how to deal with a static > perl (*cough* Schwern *cough*) should look into addding support into > M::B.
NOT IT! Anything having to do with C compiling I have no idea. I just leave those bits alone and let far smarter people patch them. -- Ahh email, my old friend. Do you know that revenge is a dish that is best served cold? And it is very cold on the Internet!
