On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Michael G Schwern<schw...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> The broader question is whether the offending tests should skip if
>> $Config{usedl} is false -- which is really just sort of papering over
>> the flaw -- or if someone who understands how to deal with a static
>> perl (*cough* Schwern *cough*) should look into addding support into
>> M::B.
>
> NOT IT!
>
> Anything having to do with C compiling I have no idea. I just leave those
> bits alone and let far smarter people patch them.
On IRC, Tux said that what the test was doing was wrong and that it
should just skip. That's definitive enough for me.
David
