> 1) If our application does not use any CGI or > perl scripts, Is it necessary to have the modules > like mod_perl and mod_fastcgi to be present in > the sever.
Even if you WERE using CGI, neither mod_perl nor mod_fastcgi would be required. mod_perl wouldn't be recommended unlss you either a) want to write Apache modules in Perl or b) run your entire site almost completely from Perl, so that most hits are to CGI scripts. mod_oprocmgr is the old outdated module for Oracle's JServ. It's not needed if you're not using Oracle, it's not needed if you're not using JServ, and it's no longer the right module anyway. Two minutes on Google would have answered both of these questions. See: http://bettercgi.com/gpl/smart-questions.html -- Ray B. Morris supp...@bettercgi.com Strongbox - The next generation in site security: http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/ Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/ Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program: http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php On 04/16/2009 10:43:11 AM, fortanu82 wrote: > > Hi > I have to completely replace the Apache 1.3 HTTP server with Apache > 2.2. > In Apache 1.3 modules like mod_fastcgi, mod_perl and mod_oprocmgr are > present. > > Now I just wanted to confirm two things, > 1) If our application does not use any CGI or perl scripts, Is it > necessary > to have the modules like mod_perl and mod_fastcgi to be present in > the > sever. > > 2) mod_oprocmgr is configured in Apache 1.3 and when I am looking to > configure the mod_oprocmgr for Apache 2.2, the module (.so) file is > not > present. Now my question is - Is this module not required in Apache > 2.2? If > it is required, how could I install and configure this module. > > Any help will be really appreciated. > Thanks > Tarun > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Regarding-setup- > modules-for-server-2.2-tp23080654p23080654.html > Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Module Writers mailing list > archive > at Nabble.com. >
