* This is the modus mailing list *
It can't be put on a share. The reason is that by nature a process that
the Modus processes that access it create a file lock and hence only one
Modus Server can access it. That was why I suggested they move to SQL.
The move to SQL can be implemented quite quickly, as they can create the
same tables. They would then just use a series of stored procedures to
access this data, thereby allowing them to have the data stored
encrypted in the database. The issue would be how many calls are made to
the database as you would not want to overload the SQL Server.
I know Michael has mentioned a clusterable version, but I don't think it
would be anytime soon.
---
Freedom of speech is wonderful - right up there with the freedom not to
listen.
(--------------------------------) {((((((
( Suneel Jhangiani ) /_ _ )
( Technical Director ) ( . . )
( Inter-Computer Technology Ltd. ) ( / )
(----------------------------------oOOo------------oOOo----)
( 40 James Street Tel: +44 (0) 20 7486 9601 )
( London W1U 1EU Fax: +44 (0) 7050 678 978 )
( United Kingdom Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
( Website: http://www.inctech.com )
(----------------------------------------------------------)
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 17:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* This is the modus mailing list *
I had a chat with Michael, and it turns out the WL / BL stuff is stored
in the SieveData.MDB file. This in turn poses major problems for those
that want to cluster servers together. The issue is that whilst one
server has the whitelist information the other doesn't.
Hmm, can that mdb be put on a shared storage device and accessed by 2
machines? How is Vircom's clustering solution that is about to come out
going to handle it?
Gary
**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
