On Dec 10, 2:24 pm, gert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I the only one here that thinks this is a bad approach (i said > approach not idea) > I mean you go from mod_wsgi and make it act as a cripple mod_scgi with > GIL stuff and no stdout to transform it into mod_php using a > interpreter that execute instructions as fast as a elephant doing > backstrokes in a swimming pool compared to c ?
hopefully if it's implemented correctly is should have performance equal to that of a pure WSGI application. If not, I'd love to hear of another approach that offers the same features/benefits/options. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to modwsgi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
