On Dec 10, 8:45 pm, wmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 2:24 pm, gert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am I the only one here that thinks this is a bad approach (i said > > approach not idea) > > I mean you go from mod_wsgi and make it act as a cripple mod_scgi with > > GIL stuff and no stdout to transform it into mod_php using a > > interpreter that execute instructions as fast as a elephant doing > > backstrokes in a swimming pool compared to c ? > > hopefully if it's implemented correctly is should have performance > equal to that of a pure WSGI application. If not, I'd love to hear of > another approach that offers the same features/benefits/options.
Behind door number 2 modifying complicated Graham code in c :-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
