On 06/01/2010 01:55 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> If not, is there a very *lightweight* version that works with Py3.1.2 that >> you know of? Or does mod_wsgi provide it's own embedded framework which I >> can use? > > The only lightweight framework that I know of that advertises itself > as working with Python, including on top of mod_wsgi is bottle. See: > > http://bottle.paws.de/ > http://bottle.paws.de/page/docs#apache-mod_wsgi
And there is flask: http://flask.pocoo.org/ While the idea of bottle is nice and it works fine, it still has various issues which make life unnecessarily hard. Flask is easy to use and is well documented and coded. And it uses python-werkzeug, which is probably the best wsgi utility library out there. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
