On 2 June 2010 20:22, Bernd Zeimetz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/01/2010 01:55 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > >>> If not, is there a very *lightweight* version that works with Py3.1.2 that >>> you know of? Or does mod_wsgi provide it's own embedded framework which I >>> can use? >> >> The only lightweight framework that I know of that advertises itself >> as working with Python, including on top of mod_wsgi is bottle. See: >> >> http://bottle.paws.de/ >> http://bottle.paws.de/page/docs#apache-mod_wsgi > > And there is flask: > http://flask.pocoo.org/ > > While the idea of bottle is nice and it works fine, it still has various > issues > which make life unnecessarily hard. Flask is easy to use and is well > documented > and coded. And it uses python-werkzeug, which is probably the best wsgi > utility > library out there.
If it wasn't for the fact that initially they said they wanted to use Python 3.X I would very much have suggested Flask. So, very much agree on you suggesting that one. The work Armin does is up with the best. Graham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
