Hi David Glad to hear you are alive :-)
Which list should we use? I think Tomaž Cerar [email protected] is willing to support <[email protected]> A quote I got from him. " If needed I can volunteer to help with maintaining the plugin and cutting the release but I would need permissions to do so. " I can also assist since we have an interest in the plugin. And there could be another person that could also assist ( just need to double check). What do you need from all of us to be able to contribute ( I mean in terms of access rights)? I mentioned in here: https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/24 <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmojohaus%2Faspectj-maven-plugin%2Fpull%2F37&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHHKfZLPU8NfWWTLLqVBLHgaedF2g> what kind of exception the a fork of the release gives. We need to make it work for jdk 10/11 so jdk 9 is not urgent. I think it would be good to revert the fix since it does not solve the problem for jdk10 ( as in issue 24). Those are our 22 cents of input. br, //mikael Den torsdag 20 september 2018 kl. 00:59:51 UTC+2 skrev David Karlsen: > > Hi - sorry for not responding to the thread that was directly to > mojo-members - the mailing list is a lot better place. > I've been - very lowbudget - maintaining this until now - but I am very > swamped at the moment - if others could chip in in would be great. > Last PR I merged was: > https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/pull/37 - which I should > probably not have done as the CI build @travis started to fail > https://travis-ci.org/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/builds - that can be > rolled back - but it was supposed to fix the JDK9 compat (I guess now 10/11 > is more relevant). > There is some discussion going on in that PR that there are some invalid > tests. > > Maybe the better option is to roll master back into a working state, get > the full fix in a PR and apply that? > > Are anybody willing to take over maintainership - maybe some of the PR > authors could join mojohaus? > > Again - sorry for the silence and latest PR merge mess - where do we want > to go with this - something needs to be done before java 11 is GA. > > tirsdag 18. september 2018 22.58.23 UTC+2 skrev Karl Heinz Marbaise > følgende: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have tried to build AspectJ Maven Plugin with JDK 9 which will fail >> mostly all integration tests.. >> >> furthermore I've tried to update aspectJ version to 1.9.1 but with the >> same result... >> >> Can we do more ? >> >> Kind regards >> Karl Heinz Marbaise >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/f191e3fa-8f96-494e-ace8-99df9e48426b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
