This one Den tor. 20. sep. 2018, 08:32 skrev mikael petterson < mikaelpetters...@gmail.com>:
> Hi David > > Glad to hear you are alive :-) > > Which list should we use? > > I think Tomaž Cerar tomaz.ce...@gmail.com is willing to support > <tomaz.ce...@gmail.com> > > A quote I got from him. > " > > If needed I can volunteer to help with maintaining the plugin and > > cutting the release but I would need permissions to do so. > " > > I can also assist since we have an interest in the plugin. And there could > be another person that could also assist ( just need to double check). > > What do you need from all of us to be able to contribute ( I mean in terms > of access rights)? > > I mentioned in here: > https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/24 > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmojohaus%2Faspectj-maven-plugin%2Fpull%2F37&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHHKfZLPU8NfWWTLLqVBLHgaedF2g> > what kind of exception the a fork of the release gives. > > We need to make it work for jdk 10/11 so jdk 9 is not urgent. > > I think it would be good to revert the fix since it does not solve the > problem for jdk10 ( as in issue 24). > > Those are our 22 cents of input. > > br, > > //mikael > > Den torsdag 20 september 2018 kl. 00:59:51 UTC+2 skrev David Karlsen: >> >> Hi - sorry for not responding to the thread that was directly to >> mojo-members - the mailing list is a lot better place. >> I've been - very lowbudget - maintaining this until now - but I am very >> swamped at the moment - if others could chip in in would be great. >> Last PR I merged was: >> https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/pull/37 - which I >> should probably not have done as the CI build @travis started to fail >> https://travis-ci.org/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/builds - that can be >> rolled back - but it was supposed to fix the JDK9 compat (I guess now 10/11 >> is more relevant). >> There is some discussion going on in that PR that there are some invalid >> tests. >> >> Maybe the better option is to roll master back into a working state, get >> the full fix in a PR and apply that? >> >> Are anybody willing to take over maintainership - maybe some of the PR >> authors could join mojohaus? >> >> Again - sorry for the silence and latest PR merge mess - where do we want >> to go with this - something needs to be done before java 11 is GA. >> >> tirsdag 18. september 2018 22.58.23 UTC+2 skrev Karl Heinz Marbaise >> følgende: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have tried to build AspectJ Maven Plugin with JDK 9 which will fail >>> mostly all integration tests.. >>> >>> furthermore I've tried to update aspectJ version to 1.9.1 but with the >>> same result... >>> >>> Can we do more ? >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Karl Heinz Marbaise >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mojohaus-dev/dkCC-L4dUyk/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > mojohaus-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to mojohaus-dev@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/f191e3fa-8f96-494e-ace8-99df9e48426b%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/f191e3fa-8f96-494e-ace8-99df9e48426b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mojohaus-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to mojohaus-dev@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CAGO7Ob1FQAbxc_YRcoP0we6BqxUOxz6ebZm7ep0W4dj4%3Dn%3DkTQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
