hi david :) new group structure idea
groups seperated by a "." like: hostgroup company1.routers 192.22.128.0 192.22.128.1 hostgroup company2.servers.web 192.33.22.22 192.33.44.44 or if the user want specify the services for a single host: hostgroup company3.workstations.burnpc1 122.22.2.22 the best: no "real" modify at the mon code ... or is this idea anywhere broken? greetz frank David Nolan schrieb: > > > --On Thursday, October 27, 2005 18:48:43 +0200 Frank 'eXplasm' Isemann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> why does mon not have a grouping mechanism? > > > As far as I know its a feature thats never been requested before. It > probably wouldn't be incredibly hard to add, but we'd have to think > about how it would be represented in the config, memory structures, > protocol and user interfaces. Supporting simply hostgroup:group-name > would probably be possible, and it would show up that way everywhere > since I believe nothing but Mon does any content validation on host > names. Let me contemplate this for a bit and evaluate the code paths > to see how complex it would be. > > -David > > David Nolan <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > curses: May you be forced to grep the termcap of an unclean yacc while > a herd of rogue emacs fsck your troff and vgrind your pathalias! > > _______________________________________________ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
