Okay, I figured out more. Sorry for spamming the list. This is
frustrating me.
I deleted mongrel_cluster 1.0.2 entirely. But check out this stack
trace. Why the heck is mongrel-1.1.4/bin/mongrel_rails requiring
mongrel_rails 1.0.2 and refusing to use mongrel_rails 1.0.5?
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in
`gem_original_require': no such file to load --
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel_cluster-1.0.2/lib/mongrel_cluster/init.rb
(LoadError)
from
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require'
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gem_plugin-0.2.3/lib/gem_plugin.rb:134:in `load'
from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/source_index.rb:142:in
`each'
from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/source_index.rb:142:in
`each'
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gem_plugin-0.2.3/lib/gem_plugin.rb:112:in `load'
from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.4/bin/mongrel_rails:278
from /usr/bin/mongrel_rails:18:in `load'
from /usr/bin/mongrel_rails:18
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Yeah, I think that closing of that ticket is right. As far as
> mongrel_rails is concerned, it makes sense to use the --clean option,
> rather than put it in there to happen by default. (although actually,
> I'd have --clean be default).
>
> My problem is that I'm using mongrel_cluster_ctl instead of
> mongrel_rails. The nice feature of mongrel_cluster_ctl here is that you
> can give it a -c argument which is a directory containing mongrel
> cluster yml files. And it will do the invoked operation to ALL of those
> config files. I like this. I want to use it.
>
> And mongrel_cluster_ctl's --clean option appears to be broken to me. I
> guess I should figure out how to fix it and submit a patch?
>
> The other problem is that the sample script at
> resources/mongrel_cluster, which invokes mongrel_cluster_ctl, doesn't
> invoke the --clean option (which wouldn't work right even if it did, but
> once it does). So I guess I should fix that and submit a patch too?
>
> I'm new to submitting patches for this kind of stuff. Can anyone
> reccommend patch etiquette/procedure to do this properly? And/or confirm
> that I'm approaching this sanely?
>
> Thanks for the help, all.
>
> Jonathan
>
> Simon Santoro wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 05 March 2008 17:59:49 Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
>>
>>
>>> What is the reccommended solution to this?
>>>
>>>
>> I don't know, put there is a patch here:
>> http://textsnippets.com/posts/show/931
>> and a ticket got submitted here:
>> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=11098&group_id=1306&atid=5147
>>
>> but it was not committed because "mongrel_rails now supports a --clean".
>> my mongrel_rails does not support it, but I may have an old version.
>>
>> I think it would be right for mongrel to clean up it's stale pid files.
>> Every
>> program I know of does that, and I patched my mongrel.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mongrel-users mailing list
>> Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software Engineer
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
410.516.8886
rochkind (at) jhu.edu
_______________________________________________
Mongrel-users mailing list
Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
