If the team does not want to let mono go worse. Then I would suggest to add 
more test cases, and a peer reviews.
But if mono team is just simply ignoring pull requests out of core business, 
and trying to make mono close for other developers. Then just let other 
volunteers know, we properly can start another more open mono project.

.Hzj_jie
________________________________
From: Edward Ned Harvey (mono)<mailto:edward.harvey.m...@clevertrove.com>
Sent: ‎21/‎9/‎2014 21:21
To: Martin Thwaites<mailto:monofo...@my2cents.co.uk>; 
何子杰Hzj_jie<mailto:hzj_...@hotmail.com>
Cc: Miguel de Icaza<mailto:mig...@xamarin.com>; Steffen 
Kieß<mailto:steffen.ki...@ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de>; 
mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com<mailto:mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com>
Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] System.Json string handling

> From: Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
>
> even as Xamarin customers you can't get anyone to review your
> patches.

As a tiny little baby step in the right direction, I think Xamarin could at 
least promise to review pull requests submitted by customers paying for 
support.  (This is a little bit shy of fully supporting mono, which would be 
even better.)

Right now, even if you're willing to pay for it, there is no such thing as mono 
support.  It's tough to get businesses developing applications on mono, staking 
the core of their business on mono development, with this kind of limitation.  
I know I made this commitment, starting my business, before I knew any better, 
and now that we're fully entrenched, people ask me in retrospect, did I make 
the right decision?  And the answers I provide are a big resounding "Maybe?"
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Reply via email to