Ah that one I agree can go away. On Nov 29, 2014 12:17 PM, "Alexander Köplinger" <alex.koeplin...@outlook.com> wrote:
> This has nothing to do with .NET Core, in the case of npgsql we only annoy > people by shipping an ancient version with Mono, like a few people > pointed out on this thread. > E.g. a core contributor asking us to remove it from Mono: > https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23119 > > -- Alex > > ------------------------------ > From: mig...@xamarin.com > Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:04:12 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] List of cleanup candidates for Mono 4.0 > To: alex.koeplin...@outlook.com > CC: monodanm...@yahoo.com; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > > Hey, > > We want to implement the same .NET Core interface when it becomes > available and to support that scenario. > > But until that world exists and all the components are cross platform, we > are just going to be annoying a bunch of people. > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Alexander Köplinger < > alex.koeplin...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I think having something in-box with Mono just for convenience makes > less sense these days given that we have NuGet. > I'd actually advocate removing everything from the Mono distribution that > does not also ship with the .NET BCL (except maybe things like Mono.Simd > which requires specific runtime features). > The world is moving towards a more modular approach and (just like .NET > Core) we should leverage NuGet where we can. > > -- Alex > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:50:05 +0000 > From: monodanm...@yahoo.com > To: monofo...@my2cents.co.uk; alex.koeplin...@outlook.com > CC: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] List of cleanup candidates for Mono 4.0 > > I agree with removing Npgsql from Mono. Or either convince someone to > commit the latest version of Npgsql to mono. It would have to build with > mono's build system though. Francisco? > > The main reason it was included in mono was so you could have an > out-of-the-box experience with mono connecting to Postgres. > > > On Thursday, November 27, 2014 6:07 PM, Martin Thwaites < > monofo...@my2cents.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > On 27 November 2014 at 18:19, Alexander Köplinger < > alex.koeplin...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > * aspnetwebstack (i.e. MVC+WebApi) -> same reasons as for EF, open-source > and on NuGet, should be used from there > > > I am actually not sure about this one, is that really the case? > > > The latest XamarinStudio/MonoDevelop MVC template installs it from NuGet, > so I think it should be fine to remove. It might not work perfectly until > the System.Web from referencesource is integrated, but the same applies to > the existing (outdated) copy we ship currently. > > > > This is something I've been working on. MVC 5.2.2 (the one available on > NuGet) just doesn't work at the moment due to this pull > https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1349 being required (and I haven't had > chance to fix the things that Miguel wanted). > > In addition, the old notes on getting MVC 3 working on mono, said to > remove the MS supplied versions of the dlls IIRC, so these would stop > working on upgrade (and replacing with the nuget ones for MVC3 probably > won't work). > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list