Hi,
I've view a different behavior with thread aborting between
Microsoft and Mono .NET implementations.
Sample:
Void ThreadProc()
{
try
{
//XXXXX
}
catch(ThreadAbortException e)
{
}
//YYYYYYY
}
//YYYYYY code is executed with Mono but not with Microsoft after thread
is aborted.
I'm using Microsoft .NET 1.1 and Mono 0.28 versions.
G.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Miguel de Icaza
Enviado el: martes, 14 de octubre de 2003 20:25
Para: Asier Llano Palacios
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: [Mono-list] Binaries naming
Hello,
> Mono and pnet will still block each other, but at least Mono will have
a
> consistent naming and easy for newbie people.
>
> I really don't mind that mono blocks pnet because I'm planning to use
only
> Mono, but as a Linux user I would prefer to have open alternatives.
That's
> why I love Linux, because the possibility of choosing.
That is a packaging issue though. The same happens with mail for
example, /usr/lib/sendmail has been hardcoded in every application, and
distributions still work around this problem without a hitch.
Miguel
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
