On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:33:49PM +0900, Ian MacLean wrote:But, as far as I know, apps don't have to know about symlinks... that's why the fs
Using a 'm' prefix can only ever be a short term fix. What happens when there a multiple stable versions of mono that need to be installed side by side ? you can't really do m1.0ilasm.exe ans m1.1ilasm.exe
In the past there was a problem with the versions and the "alternatives" system solved the problem. In my debian, I've got 3 versions of gcc, gcc-2.95, gcc-3.2 and gcc-3.3... the alternatives system makes a symlink from "gcc" alone to "gcc-X.X" where "X.X" is the version.
For the problem with ilasm I think we can change our name and use alternatives. "monoasm" is a very good name (like "monodis"). But we can't do that because a couple of applications will try to load "ilasm.exe" and that applications don't uderstand of symlinks... it could crash the apps.
exists for, isn't it?
Regards,
Iratxo.
Like said in my country "Here is my sandgrain".
Regards,
Pedro
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
