On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 19:05 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > Hello, > > We are having a debate about the current packaging strategy: so far > we have split everything into small chunks that have correct dependency > information. > > Although this is useful for folks that want to get very granular > setups, the problem is that people have to download 20+ packages to get > a complete Mono install. > > An intermediary hack was to create a mono-all.zip file that contains > everything and have people download that. > > My feeling is that we should go back to the simpler two way split: > mono and mono-devel packages. > > What do people think?
How would this affect source distribution of Mono? Would the entire source code for the compiler, runtime, class library, XSP, mod_mono, GTK#, MonoDevelop, etc, be lumped into a single tar.gz? Would it affect the CVS structure? Or does this only concern binary distribution in the formats provided by Novell? (The RPMs listed on the mono download page.) -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
