On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:05:05PM -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > Hello, > > We are having a debate about the current packaging strategy: so far > we have split everything into small chunks that have correct dependency > information. > > Although this is useful for folks that want to get very granular > setups, the problem is that people have to download 20+ packages to get > a complete Mono install. > > An intermediary hack was to create a mono-all.zip file that contains > everything and have people download that. > > My feeling is that we should go back to the simpler two way split: > mono and mono-devel packages.
Personally, I would prefer the smaller number of packages. But, I can see the reason for the multitude of packages for the OS distributions. So, with that said, I would recommend a flag in the spec files to build it either way, with the default being the 2 packages. Now, if I can just figure out how to generate the daily builds.... - Dennis > > What do people think? > > Miguel. > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
