On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 20:36 -0400, Duncan Mak wrote: > On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 19:45, Todd Berman wrote: > > > > Why isnt is possible to create a 'mono' and 'mono-devel' package that is > > basically a stub that deps on what would go in those. That way you get > > the best of both worlds. > > > > We already have something similar, we have mono-complete and > mono-complete-devel. The problem is that, removing mono-complete does > not remove the packages that it depends on, as it is simply an empty > (meta) package.
I am totally clueless about the rpm format, but you cant somehow specify some uninstall script/hook/whatever that uninstalls all the packages when the -complete or -complete-devel is removed? --Todd _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
