> Mhm, I cannot understand what you meant. What is (and should not be?) > discarded? My patch handles usual "/** ... */" comments as well as > those comments.
Well, you can only understand /** * <summary>This is ok</summary> */ but not this. It will complain... /** * Raw text is not ok. */ > Actually why I prefered XmlElement instead of raw string was to handle > warnings embedded into the XML documentation. Having just a raw string > in MemberCore is not sufficient. Right. You point is well taken. Mine is just an extension. > When it comes to that you're just using the common markup to > csc /doc, why just not pipeline to ndoc(-console) or whatever? Because they will not understand "extended" tags. My idea is to the built the infrastructure like that of Doclet and Taglet, hence I cannot simply pipeline. > Well, such extensions should not be done with /doc switch. It should > be available in different switch name, for example /docx. That's what mcsdoc is. But for that to happen, I should be able to get the raw comment, not XMLElement. I hope that explains my bits. -- Happy Hacking, Gaurav http://csdoc.sf.net -------------------- _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
