Oh, and I think most of that the code generation is going to be database backend and UI stuff. :-)
Trober wrote: > >> Can anyone shed some light? > there's not that much to CodeSmith, why bother vs. building a quick > parser/template/generator? > you're better off getting a simple grammar(s) together with an easy-to-use > parser, and just fill in the templates yourself > you'll own the generators when done, and they don't take up that much > extra > effort vs. what they save > >> I'm anticipating a lot of code-generation heavy work. > shed some light on what you're trying to build. > Anything that's ORM, service framework (aspx, asmx, WCF, etc.), and even > UI > parts should be auto-gen'd :-) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "anton123" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:00 PM > Subject: [Mono-list] Question on Code Generation > > >> >> I'm wondering if there's a Mono substitute/counterpart to CodeSmith (or >> if >> Mono does support CodeSmith). I'm hoping it might since I'm anticipating >> a >> lot of code-generation heavy work. Can anyone shed some light? >> >> Thank you so much! >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22919191.html >> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22920204.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
