Interesting to hear that. Can you spare some more details? I'd be most interested to hear what you found in it.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. :-) Trober wrote: > >> I see what CodeSmith actually generates, it may be relatively >> straightforward to produce a template generator > I did an eval and tossed it. > You can duplicate enough of what it does in very little time. > >> cut down the clutter > ??? You can clutter things with the templates you build, or not. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "anton123" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 7:24 PM > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Question on Code Generation > > >> >> Well, sounds like I'll have to roll up some sleeves and start hacking. >> :-) >> Actually, that's what one of the other teams is using (of which I have >> very >> little information other than the tools they use, e.g. Visual Studio and >> CodeSmith). Me and my co-workers are expecting that we may have to adopt >> that to dive right in and work with their code. As of now, the word is >> that >> CodeSmith will be able to cut down the clutter on many things. I presume >> if >> I see what CodeSmith actually generates, it may be relatively >> straightforward to produce a template generator. >> >> If anyone has ideas and opinions, I'll really appreciate it because it's >> still some time away from when I'll be doing some heavy .Net work and >> would >> be nice to be prepared. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> Trober wrote: >>> >>>> Can anyone shed some light? >>> there's not that much to CodeSmith, why bother vs. building a quick >>> parser/template/generator? >>> you're better off getting a simple grammar(s) together with an >>> easy-to-use >>> parser, and just fill in the templates yourself >>> you'll own the generators when done, and they don't take up that much >>> extra >>> effort vs. what they save >>> >>>> I'm anticipating a lot of code-generation heavy work. >>> shed some light on what you're trying to build. >>> Anything that's ORM, service framework (aspx, asmx, WCF, etc.), and even >>> UI >>> parts should be auto-gen'd :-) >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "anton123" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:00 PM >>> Subject: [Mono-list] Question on Code Generation >>> >>> >>>> >>>> I'm wondering if there's a Mono substitute/counterpart to CodeSmith (or >>>> if >>>> Mono does support CodeSmith). I'm hoping it might since I'm >>>> anticipating >>>> a >>>> lot of code-generation heavy work. Can anyone shed some light? >>>> >>>> Thank you so much! >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22919191.html >>>> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22920025.html >> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22920950.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
