> I see what CodeSmith actually generates, it may be relatively > straightforward to produce a template generator I did an eval and tossed it. You can duplicate enough of what it does in very little time.
> cut down the clutter ??? You can clutter things with the templates you build, or not. ----- Original Message ----- From: "anton123" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 7:24 PM Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Question on Code Generation > > Well, sounds like I'll have to roll up some sleeves and start hacking. :-) > Actually, that's what one of the other teams is using (of which I have > very > little information other than the tools they use, e.g. Visual Studio and > CodeSmith). Me and my co-workers are expecting that we may have to adopt > that to dive right in and work with their code. As of now, the word is > that > CodeSmith will be able to cut down the clutter on many things. I presume > if > I see what CodeSmith actually generates, it may be relatively > straightforward to produce a template generator. > > If anyone has ideas and opinions, I'll really appreciate it because it's > still some time away from when I'll be doing some heavy .Net work and > would > be nice to be prepared. > > Thanks! > > > Trober wrote: >> >>> Can anyone shed some light? >> there's not that much to CodeSmith, why bother vs. building a quick >> parser/template/generator? >> you're better off getting a simple grammar(s) together with an >> easy-to-use >> parser, and just fill in the templates yourself >> you'll own the generators when done, and they don't take up that much >> extra >> effort vs. what they save >> >>> I'm anticipating a lot of code-generation heavy work. >> shed some light on what you're trying to build. >> Anything that's ORM, service framework (aspx, asmx, WCF, etc.), and even >> UI >> parts should be auto-gen'd :-) >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "anton123" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:00 PM >> Subject: [Mono-list] Question on Code Generation >> >> >>> >>> I'm wondering if there's a Mono substitute/counterpart to CodeSmith (or >>> if >>> Mono does support CodeSmith). I'm hoping it might since I'm >>> anticipating >>> a >>> lot of code-generation heavy work. Can anyone shed some light? >>> >>> Thank you so much! >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22919191.html >>> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22920025.html > Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
