Hi Stephen! Thanks you for answer and suggestion. We use CentOS on our productions servers. Thats why we build mono from sources. I've found two branches in svn: mono-2-4-0 and mono-2-4-1. 2-4-1 have no some important parts: libgdiplus and mod_mono. Should we use these parts from mono-2-4-0 ?
With best wishes, Maxim Karavaev > if you are feeling adventurous I have *some* of the 2.4.1/svn rpms in > a repo [0]. They are there for testing iFolder. I'm not sure what > state they are in, but if you need them to test something they are > there. They seemed to be just fine on my machine, but not willing to > make any promises... > > The rpms are for openSUSE 11.0/1 and SLE11 > > Cheers, > Stephen > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Mono://UIA://iFolder/ > > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Maxim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> +1 >> I'm waiting for 2.4.1 too. >> It should be some fixes, that I need a lot. >> >> All the best, >> Maxim Karavaev >> >> Peter Hagen wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> are there any plans on releasing the 2.4.1 officially with the 'inotify >>> fix'? I think I need to upgrade my 2.0.1 to 2.4.1 to get a remoting >>> problem fixed, but I don't want to do this with a svn version >>> >>> With kind regards >>> >>> Peter Hagen >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
