My bad, use mono-2-4, that is where the fixes are, and what we will be branching from. So confusing!
Jonathan Jonathan Pobst wrote: > mono-2-4-0 is more complete and recent than mono-2-4-1, so use all of > mono-2-4-0. > > 2.4.1 was made for a specific project, and has not been updated since. > All fixes intended to be part of 2.4.2 are on the 2.4.0 branch, but may > not be on the 2.4.1 branch. Pretend 2.4.1 doesn't exist. :) > > We will be branching 2.4.2 from 2.4.0. > > Jonathan > > Maxim wrote: >> Hi Stephen! >> >> Thanks you for answer and suggestion. We use CentOS on our productions >> servers. Thats why we build mono from sources. >> I've found two branches in svn: mono-2-4-0 and mono-2-4-1. >> 2-4-1 have no some important parts: libgdiplus and mod_mono. >> Should we use these parts from mono-2-4-0 ? > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
