Hi Jonathan! So, we should use mono-2-4 branch instead of mono-2-4-0? And we should forget about branch mono-2-4-1? Just check that I understand all in correct way :)
Thanks for help! Maxim Karavaev > My bad, use mono-2-4, that is where the fixes are, and what we will be > branching from. So confusing! > > Jonathan > > Jonathan Pobst wrote: >> mono-2-4-0 is more complete and recent than mono-2-4-1, so use all of >> mono-2-4-0. >> >> 2.4.1 was made for a specific project, and has not been updated >> since. All fixes intended to be part of 2.4.2 are on the 2.4.0 >> branch, but may not be on the 2.4.1 branch. Pretend 2.4.1 doesn't >> exist. :) >> >> We will be branching 2.4.2 from 2.4.0. >> >> Jonathan >> >> Maxim wrote: >>> Hi Stephen! >>> >>> Thanks you for answer and suggestion. We use CentOS on our >>> productions >>> servers. Thats why we build mono from sources. >>> I've found two branches in svn: mono-2-4-0 and mono-2-4-1. >>> 2-4-1 have no some important parts: libgdiplus and mod_mono. >>> Should we use these parts from mono-2-4-0 ? >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
