deb http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/Ubuntu_9.10_standard/ ./ don't work for you ? Are you using x86_64, as i said is broken ? At least you can took the source files who are ok and use it in lunchpad ppa of ubuntu
2010/1/14 Chorn Sokun <[email protected]>: > Totally agree with @daniel except that I am not agree the part where said we > not thanks/appreciate Ubuntu team. > I don't know about the rest of the world but for me and the people that I > introduce to /talk with them about Ubuntu they all appreciate the great > afford and policing put into get this excellent distro for us. > > Perhap using Window & develop in .NET Framework with just click and get > thing work make me junior coder a lazy labor. However to abandon Windows > camp and join Linux my option is to pick popular Linux distro and can do my > job on it that how I feel having mono ready and up to date on the Ubuntu > (official support :D) would be a big plus. > > Build one run every where ! > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Chorn Sokun > +855 12 222718 > > http://chornsokun.wordpress.com > http://twitter.com/csokun > > > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, daniel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every >> 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released >> between OS versions. >> >> Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however >> I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which >> is supplied by the developers (not the ubuntu devs) >> >> The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS >> releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono and include it in >> its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow >> leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank >> them? no, you just expect more of them. >> >> I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted >> to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to >> package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they >> packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can >> decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be. >> >> So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing >> applications, how is this different from on any other operating system? >> >> It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist >> OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a >> PPA. >> >> The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop >> linux distribution to the mono project. >> >> At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it >> need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in >> 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but >> mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their >> are lots of other people out there with similar stories. Those of us who >> use ubuntu feel a little bit like second class citizens. >> >> >> >> B.R. wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Bálint Kardos <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hi Stephen, >> > >> > Fact 1: the provider decides on the virtualized platforms, not me. >> > They have Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian systems ready. >> > >> > Fact 2: I've used Debian and Fedora for a decade, so I'm more >> > familiar with Ubuntu as with SuSe. >> > >> > Fact 3: I've started working on merging all my sites/servers back >> > to Windows 2008. >> > It is a sad story, but the lack of real features on mono (Web >> > Services still has bugs for years, the LINQ implementation is a >> > horror etc.) makes it more and more hard to use it as a real >> > Production (not a toy playground) platform. >> > >> > >> > üdvözlettel >> > with regards >> > >> > Kardos Bálint >> > _______________________________________ >> > http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben >> > >> > >> > If there are web services bugs, file bugs--if nobody knows about them, >> > they can't get fixed. Also, clarify what you mean by LINQ? LINQ to >> > Objects is pretty simple and there's only so many ways to implement >> > that, so I'm not sure how you can lay claim to that being a horror. >> > LINQ to SQL is a different story, and a huge effort that is only now >> > beginning to be integrated into Mono properly. You could also file >> > bugs for those--once again, if nobody knows about them, they can't get >> > fixed. >> > >> > --B.R. >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > -- Cordially. Deploy your softwares for all platforms and finally update them in 3 clicks. Try now the OpenSource MonoOSC tool http://monoosc.sourceforge.net/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/ windows take you more($), Linux give you more!! Political Power cannot be wisdom! Small Eric Quotations of the days: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
