Hi I don't understand the problem, I compiled 2.6.1 and MD 2.2 on Ubuntu 32 and 64 without a problem. No breaking anything. It works like a ... ehm.. [think of something good yourself].
Cheers Peter On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 08:52 -0800, Chorn Sokun wrote: > In short wait or abandon Debian/Ubuntu and try OpenSuse. > Long story build it yourself get ready to break Debian/Ubuntu > stability doable be brave :) > However at the end of the day you build base on the trunk and what if > you need to redistribute your app will the end user need to build the > framework the way we did? I better wait until Ubuntu ship the version > that easy enough (2.6 with MonoDevelop 2.2) but I will keep an eye on > the mono dev progress however I stick with .NET for the time being. > > > Just a thought ! > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Chorn Sokun > +855 12 222718 > > http://chornsokun.wordpress.com > http://twitter.com/csokun > > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Robert Jordan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 12.01.2010 21:03, James Mansion wrote: > > B.R. wrote: > >> Universal binaries were provided at one point, in the form > of an > >> "Universal Linux Installer." These were discontinued around > Mono > >> 1.9.1, because they didn't work properly on most distros: > components > >> that were relied on were not ABI-stable, installed binaries > would stop > >> working because libs would change on the system, libs would > be in the > >> wrong places without LD_LIBRARY_PATH being set, etc. In > short, it was > >> one giant cockup for the most part, and was hence > discontinued in > >> favor of letting distro packagers handle it themselves, > seeing as in > >> almost every case, they know better. > > > You have to make the installation effectively > self-contained. Everything > > you say would apply to Java too - but there's just two files > for that - > > a .bin and a .rpm. > > > Mono depends upon these libs: > > libexif.so > libexpat.so > libfontconfig.so > libfreetype.so > libglib-2.0.so > libgmodule-2.0.so > libgthread-2.0.so > libjpeg.so > libpng12.so > libpthread.so > libtiff.so > libungif.so > libz.so > > You don't really want to redistribute them, do you? If yes, > who > will take care of patching them if (security) bugs become > apparent? > > How would linux look like if every large app would be > distributed like this? > > Robert > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
