Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Hardest part is coming up with a sensible way for the user to express > this desire -- any suggestions?
off the top of my head --local (a la cvs) comes to mind... > Though I guess the semantics of listing a directory are not totally > clear; if I say 'log foo/', and there's a file foo/bar that used to be > in some other dir, should the log include edits to foo/bar before it > was in this dir? if there used to be a file called foo/bar but is no > longer, should the log include edits to foo/bar when it was in this > dir? part of me thinks we should list the rename but not bother tracing back beyond that point. if that is the file you're interested in, you can ask for a log from the rename revision using the old name to keep going. Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
