In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:59 +0100, Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
lapo> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: lapo> > Yeah, I see what you mean. And still, I think I'd prefer to lapo> > release what we have now. And since you basically gave me a lapo> > blank go-ahead ;-). lapo> lapo> Take in account that there is a known bug using reverse (that lapo> is, from older to newer) 'log' without --no-graph, when a lapo> revision has more than 2 childs. Considering there seems to be some instability with this new feature, would find it very horrible if we, for some time, transformed the feature to be opt-in (with --graph) rather than opt-out (--no-graph)? Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
