On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 14:40 -0400, Stephen Leake wrote: > Timothy Brownawell <tbrow...@prjek.net> writes:
> > So the question is, what needs to be done on the asio branch? And how > > can we mitigate the problems people have with linking against boost? > > Do we have a list of such problems? Maybe we can just assume boost got > better :). The two that come to mind are * different (and therefore annoying) build system * version skew wrt libstdc++, eg boost and monotone have different ideas of what exactly an std::string looks like > configure says mtn requires asio 1.2; Debian 5.0 (lenny stable) has > only asio 1.1.1. sid unstable has asio 1.4.1; that might be promoted > to stable before we get done with this :). Heh. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel