On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 21:10 -0600, Derek Scherger wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Brownawell > <tbrow...@prjek.net> wrote:
> > * version skew wrt libstdc++, eg boost and monotone have > different ideas of what exactly an std::string looks like > > Fantastic. Can you elaborate on this? I wonder how it's even possible > when boost is built with the same libstdc++ as monotone on my machine? Say your distribution is on gcc 3.4 so that's what boost is compiled with, and the binary on our site was compiled with 4.0. Or even if you compile it yourself, but you've installed a later version of gcc than the version that your distro is currently using. This might not currently be an issue with gcc being in the middle of 4.x, I don't know what their rule on incompatible changes is. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel