Hello Well I open several intances of MonoDevelop by using automator - > Run Shell Script and the following command "open -n /Applications/MonoDevelop.app"
This creates me an .app file then i just put it on my dock and whenever i want to open a new instance of MonoDevelop i just click the .app file :) Alex Soto On Oct 25, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Brian Newton wrote: > Right, > > It's not about opening a second version of the program, just being able to > have two solutions open simultaneously for comparison etc. Many apps allow > new windows with new content (Word, all browsers etc). But yep, I'll give > Jason's terminal hack a try in the meantime. > > Brian > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Mike Muegel <[email protected]> wrote: > Rolf, I don't think Demis and I want a second "instance." We just want the > ability to open 2+ solutions at the same time but each solution is in a > different window (same MD instance/icon). Just like any other document > oriented Mac app, but the "document" is the solution. > > Cjeers, > -Mike > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Rolf Bjarne Kvinge <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Michael Muegel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> not being able to have two solutions/copies of MD open > > My #1 non-bug issue. Doing "keep solution open" in Open helps but not nearly > > as useful as second window. > > Jason's open -n trick will help for now. But adding support for MD "windows" > > would be really great. > > This is actually how the Mac is supposed to work. It's not MonoDevelop > that refuses to open another instance, it's the Mac that just > activates the current instance instead of creating a new one when you > click on the MonoDevelop icon. > > Rolf > > > Thanks, > > -Mike > > From: Brian Newton <[email protected]> > > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:37:23 -0700 > > To: Demis Bellot <[email protected]> > > Cc: <[email protected]>, competent_tech > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [MonoTouch] Do the makers of Monodevelop actually test the > > application? > > > > Monodevelop has been relatively stable for me, I've never had issues with > > USB debugging. I did start running into some issues after just straight > > upgrading to Lion, but a full uninstall of all components/reinstall in the > > proper order did the trick. The only thing that's a constant irritant is not > > being able to do find in all files (it just never finds anything) and not > > being able to have two solutions/copies of MD open at the same time as far > > as I can tell. Makes comparing my code with Miguel's amazing sample code > > more difficult. =) > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Demis Bellot <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> >Sigh, Reply all... > >> The main problem with MonoDevelop is most devs using it are coming from > >> a VS.NET (and possibly R#) background, so yeah the new IDE and lacks some > >> features that can slow down productivity some-what. > >> But the value of MonoTouch/Droid is clearly being able to run C# on > >> iOS/Android with the possibility of re-using your existing code-base which > >> IMHO more than makes up for any productivity loss. > >> In this light, the value more than justifies the cost. > >> - Demis > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:07 PM, competent_tech > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I pay $2500/year for visual studio which has crashed about the same > >>> number of > >>> times as monodevelop since I started using it 3 months ago. > >>> > >>> I pay $1500/year for one windows/asp.net component suite and filing bugs > >>> with the vendor results in them telling us that the obviously broken > >>> control > >>> behavior is by design after "analyzing" the issue for 2 months. The first > >>> and only bug I have filed with monotouch/monodevelop had a workaround in > >>> < 2 > >>> hours and a permanent fix in < 24 hours. > >>> > >>> We were able to convert more than 500,000 LOC from an existing Windows > >>> tablet app written in VB to monotouch in 3 months and now have customers > >>> lining up at the door for the iPad version. > >>> > >>> Yes there are some issues and I would be happy to have more third party > >>> controls and suites to choose from, but overall, monodevelop and > >>> monotouch > >>> are absolute steals and incredibly well supported. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> View this message in context: > >>> http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/Do-the-makers-of-Monodevelop-actually-test-the-application-tp3932349p3934907.html > >>> Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> MonoTouch mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> MonoTouch mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch > > _______________________________________________ > > MonoTouch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > MonoTouch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
_______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
