I think that if dakmor sticks to showcasing 3rd party MooTools plugins, and not the official components, they can both coexist.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, daKmoR <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 12, 10:40 am, ibolmo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok this is a bit overboard. There's no need to have you clone > > mootools' demos and then invite others to send to yours. I mean it's > > all MIT, but it's just leaves a bad taste. > I mainly build it for the sake of it, as it helped me to learn more > mootools and I thought I could help some people... > it's definitely not the nicest code, but it "gives" the "old" 1.1 > feeling for getting the demo code (I believe it's way more convenient) > I say on the first page, that most of the demos are just plain copies > from the official demo page... > I just wanted to stay "compatible" so I can get the new demos easily > if they are added to the official demo page, and I could easily > provide new demos... > > > Have you tried to talk to kami? > yeah I tried to talk to a few core developers, but I didn't got any > feedback. hmm yeah that was a long time ago.... :p -- Guillermo Rauch http://devthought.com
