I guess you did understand me. My issue just was that it's going to be confusing if people have two places with common demos, but one has more because others preferred to send it to darkmor.
Like I said, that's perfectly correct; but I would agree with Guillermo that as long as there's clear separation between the two -- with defined purposes for both -- then it makes sense. Otherwise, I'd opt to have you talk to kami. Olmo On Jan 12, 9:55 am, "Guillermo Rauch" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that if dakmor sticks to showcasing 3rd party MooTools plugins, and > not the official components, they can both coexist. > > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, daKmoR <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jan 12, 10:40 am, ibolmo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ok this is a bit overboard. There's no need to have you clone > > > mootools' demos and then invite others to send to yours. I mean it's > > > all MIT, but it's just leaves a bad taste. > > I mainly build it for the sake of it, as it helped me to learn more > > mootools and I thought I could help some people... > > it's definitely not the nicest code, but it "gives" the "old" 1.1 > > feeling for getting the demo code (I believe it's way more convenient) > > I say on the first page, that most of the demos are just plain copies > > from the official demo page... > > I just wanted to stay "compatible" so I can get the new demos easily > > if they are added to the official demo page, and I could easily > > provide new demos... > > > > Have you tried to talk to kami? > > yeah I tried to talk to a few core developers, but I didn't got any > > feedback. hmm yeah that was a long time ago.... :p > > -- > Guillermo Rauchhttp://devthought.com
