Thats the best thing indeed. I don't think there is a big demand for it. But if your plugin is so popular in the Forge, useful and well written, it might be added to Array.Extras in More. (at least not before 2.0 i guess)
On 3 jun, 11:37, Barry van Oudtshoorn <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe add it to the forge. If you bundled it up with a collection of > useful Array utilities, it'd make it an even more attractive package. :) > > On 3/06/2010 5:26 PM, Robert wrote: > > > > > > > Hmm, > > Should I add it as a ticket to the lighthouse? > > > It looks like they only accept bugfixes? > > > On 2 Cze, 11:07, Robert<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I believe intersection method would be good extension to the Array > >> class. There is combine method (set sum) but no set intersection. > > >> It could look like this: > > >> Array.implement({ > >> attest: function(item, array) { > >> if (!array.contains(item)) this.erase(item); > >> return this; > >> }, > >> intersection: function(array) { > >> for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i< l; i++) > >> this.attest(this[i], array); > >> return this; > >> } > > >> }); > > >> What You think? > > -- > Not sent from my Apple πPhone
